Russell Crowe Shares Thoughts On Gladiator II “Failure”

The former Gladiator has had his say about Ridley Scott's sequel

russellcrowegladiator (1)

Actor Russell Crowe has shared his thoughts on why the 2024 sequel to 2000’s Gladiator fell short in capturing audience interest when compared to the original. The first film was directed by Ridley Scott as his eleventh feature film and written by David Franzoni,ย John Logan, andย William Nicholson.

It starred Crowe asย of a Roman general betrayed by an emperor’s bloodthirsty son.

The sequel saw Scott return as director and featured Paul Mescal,ย Pedro Pascal,ย Joseph Quinn,ย Fred Hechinger, and Denzel Washington, with Nielsen and Jacobi reprising their original roles.

Crowe also stated his objection to excessive sexually graphic scenes in the original film, as consistently suggested by the studio, stating, โ€œI just kept pushing back.”

โ€œI said, โ€˜This is a story about a man whoโ€™s avenging the death of his wife and his child. There cannot be a moment on that journey where he stops and has sex with somebody,'” Crowe added. “‘It doesnโ€™t make any senseโ€ฆ that destroys the journeyโ€™.โ€

โ€œThey fought me, they sent me letters about it and everything, and I just stuck to my guns. Luckily for me, Ridley [Scott], even though he would have loved to write a sex scene withย Connie Nielsen and me, he agreed with me back then, and that that was the moral core of the film.โ€

Crowe also expressed that the end goal for what they were making was “something really, really old-fashioned and the studio kind of, at the time, didnโ€™t quite understand why.”

The star also stressed that gender dynamics and demographics play a part in screenwriting and in the film’s core values, something he believed generated diversity in audiences. “On the surface,ย Gladiatorย is a movie for men, but if it was a movie for men, it would be about revenge. But itโ€™s not about revenge,” he added. “Itโ€™s a movie for women because itโ€™s about vengeance, and this is a subtle difference, but it is a difference. I needed the character to stay on that track.โ€

SUPPORT US!!! WE ARE A SMALL, INDEPENDENT FILM WEBSITE WITH NO BIG BACKERS, SO IF YOU LOVE OUR SITE AND OUR WRITERS, PLEASE CONSIDER HELPING US TO KEEP FILM JOURNALISM ALIVE!

Crowe felt that “the second movie” helped to “destroy that moral centre” yet acknowledged the business side of things, stating he finds it “very interesting because the second movie barely took the same box office that the first movie took.”

The first Gladiator film grossed $466 million worldwide from a budget of $103 million, while its follow-up made a total of $462 million from a $210-310 million budget, a $4 million difference in box office gross paired with a $107-207 million budget difference.

But thatโ€™s 20 years later, and when you apply how much of a change thereโ€™s been on the value of a dollar, they failed,” Crowe emphasised. “Andย they failed because they didnโ€™t understand why it was successful, because it had a moral core.”


Source: Deadline

Discover more from

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

What do you feel about this?

Discover more from

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Subscribe